FRED A. BAUGHMAN JR., M.D.
NEUROLOGY & CHILD NEUROLOGY (Board Certified)
1303 Hidden Mountain Drive
El Cajon , CA 92019
Sandra F. Olson, MD, President June 5, 2003
55116
Dear Dr. Olson,
As a Fellow of the American Academy Neurology I am shocked to find it’s leadership (and that of the Child Neurology Society—CNS, with over-lapping membership) colluding with organized psychiatry (American Psychiatric Association—APA, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry--AACAP), pediatrics (American Academy of Pediatrics--AAP), and family practice (American Academy of Family Practice--AAFP), toward the marketplace end of representing to the public-at-large, and to patients, that psychiatric conditions/diagnoses are brain/neurological, disorders/diseases/chemical imbalances, when none of them are, to make “patients” of normal individuals and to elicit and justify their treatment with drugs/ “chemical balancers.”
Diagnosis is the first, most important, duty of every physician. As all neurologists know, the first part of diagnosis (1) is to determine whether or not a physical abnormality/disease is present. In persons in whom an abnormality/disease is found, the physician’s next duty (2) is to determine which abnormality/disease—what physicians know as differential diagnosis. Neurology is the challenging science and art of diagnosis of abnormalities/diseases of the brain/nervous system.
Lay persons/patients are easily confused and deceived when it comes to the language of medicine, and have no alternative but to trust us—their physicians. And what I am speaking about here is a systematic, organized effort to deceive them regarding the fundamental issue of whether or not they are diseased/abnormal or disease-free/normal.
I have no doubt that you, and all in leadership in the AAN (and CNS), are fully aware that neurology was established as a specialty, apart from psychiatry, in 1948, neurology to deal with physical/organic abnormalities of the brain/nervous system--diseases; psychiatry with emotional and behavioral problems in medically/neurologically normal individuals; in persons in whom physical/organic/neurological abnormalities had been excluded/ruled out. All of us in neurology (both adult and child neurology) understand this and understand that our legitimate responsibility to psychiatric patients and to our psychiatrist colleagues is that of excluding the presence of organic disease--real disease. Knowing all of this, it is a betrayal for any physician--neurologists, most of all, to represent to patients, and to the public, that wholly subjective, psychiatric, constructs/conditions, are actual diseases of the brain—neurological diseases--the purpose being to make “patients” of normals. Nor can it be denied that this is what is going on, in the US , on a massive scale. An ethical psychiatrist-friend recently observed that the “invented diseases” industry rakes in billions of dollars.